From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id jBBOHqW+TWCmHgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:43:33 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6D0381EF78; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:43:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE531E54D for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:43:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FAE3860C34; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:43:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C6FAE3860C34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615707811; bh=JcvHozI0B7Sug1DytYcSIL3NIuGkXXR3i8W/aihj4tI=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=oUBxO1xjlDdnkjQOkM5BOCzqZIz89jtkpE9kJrU6697PWcEYy5/MRY4OjtEZfznFg me1wiZqFLO9WP1jCI4vFS4tjHLpJHsD1Eks4iHri0e2Uge07SlKvo2iLsenX1k11vC GJ2QJxXwy9P73meDjoqkBQnO3Z2sOLo/LbPvPVDI= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3023860C34 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:43:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0D3023860C34 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLPM-0002xm-2i; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:43:28 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4010 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLPJ-0002nk-TQ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:43:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:43:33 +0200 Message-Id: <83ft0ygoyi.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: <87czw242h4.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:29:59 +0100) Subject: Re: Demangling in backtraces References: <83h7loun5e.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wzjuuk.fsf@gnu.org> <6005438b-e445-05f4-f063-d62016d2885a@polymtl.ca> <83pn02gufq.fsf@gnu.org> <87czw242h4.fsf@linux-m68k.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Simon Marchi , Hannes Domani > , Eli Zaretskii > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:29:59 +0100 > > On Mär 14 2021, Eli Zaretskii via Gdb wrote: > > > Thanks. So does this mean we don't have any kind of "manual > > demangler" in GDB that could be turned on in cases like this, when > > "just works" doesn't? Hannes, any ideas? > > (gdb) help demangle > Demangle a mangled name. > Usage: demangle [-l LANGUAGE] [--] NAME > If LANGUAGE is not specified, NAME is demangled in the current language. Sure, I know. I thought there could be some "set FOO" knob that would demangle automatically in the backtraces. The above works, of course (one must use "-l c++", btw), but not if I submit the "decorated" name, such as "libgccjit-0!_Z17gimple_build_callP9tree_nodejz". Thanks.