From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35923-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3898 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2009 18:37:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 3890 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2009 18:37:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:37:32 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KRB00700AD7DC00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:37:29 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.84.229]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KRB00BKPAEFIS50@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:37:29 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:37:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
In-reply-to: <m37hv35cnx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com, msnyder@vmware.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83eipbjdpf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4ACFD8B7.4090902@vmware.com> <4ACFF3C7.3030802@gmail.com> <200910101745.27358.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83iqenjf1f.fsf@gnu.org> <m37hv35cnx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb@sourceware.org,
>         dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com, msnyder@vmware.com
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:25:38 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> >  Or append "-Wunused-value"?
> >> 
> >> Sounds like a good first step to me.
> 
> Eli> What version of GCC introduced this switch?
> 
> It seems to have been added here:
> 
>     Wed May 17 17:27:44 2000  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
> 
>             * flags.h (warn_unused_function, warn_unused_label,
>             warn_unused_parameter, warn_unused_variable, warn_unused_value):
>             Replace ``warn_unused''.
>             (set_Wunused): Add declaration.
>     [...]
> 
> That would put it in 3.0 and maybe 2.95.3.

Thanks, that's old enough to be useful for most, if not all, of those
who build GDB.