From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id GCiwGZM5RGMyGgkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:26:11 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 66F8F1E112; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:26:11 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=kNAZBYPf; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970E41E0CB for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B1394D823 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:26:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F36B1394D823 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665415567; bh=eDrtpSnnJBIK6C9zH5891cYTNX5Sh3fQjQlxo7y5JIU=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=kNAZBYPfnH+8Ef63/3/6ev2wAMDzOqiFx4A/4UBezSHlR8zyZS9Mpr+qDX0GgC7Mr U19CfHS7cB0ePoqiYJ9lao+9ds6rIGFv4FFxjkK8yWVYf9G1K0zjpYuNPUSXvO4/sY eUw2ThaQNfc4ecC8B4fXsbEc6/QSCNDlgRwXjsZs= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9E73949087 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:25:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7E9E73949087 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohuew-0006Qv-W5; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:25:39 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4769 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohuew-00047X-9U; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:25:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:25:45 +0300 Message-Id: <83edvfhf9i.fsf@gnu.org> To: Bruno Larsen In-Reply-To: <222feff2-4453-1f61-9f55-07249c0b8e43@redhat.com> (message from Bruno Larsen on Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:26:33 +0200) Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. References: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> <790305bd-9cdf-9dbc-6b8e-b55f1f70258f@simark.ca> <834jwelc26.fsf@gnu.org> <1c95e1f9-db82-a60e-7d4d-21eaea4435db@redhat.com> <83k058ggcp.fsf@gnu.org> <83h70bhqbe.fsf@gnu.org> <4977bda3-7f8d-1be5-d3e1-143c40c953f2@redhat.com> <83fsfvhlbr.fsf@gnu.org> <222feff2-4453-1f61-9f55-07249c0b8e43@redhat.com> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: simark@simark.ca, gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:26:33 +0200 > Cc: simark@simark.ca, gdb@sourceware.org > From: Bruno Larsen > > >> Ah, so I'll suggest that you approve the documentation changes, and I'll > >> mention that some approvers may sometimes only approve part of the > >> patch, so one should make sure the whole patch is approved before pushing. > > I'm not sure I understand: do you mean that I should not use _any_ tag > > at all, when the patch includes more than just documentation? > > Sorry for making things even more confusing. I meant that you use > Approved-by tags. OK, thanks.