From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-41996-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32043 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2013 09:29:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 32029 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2013 09:29:51 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:29:50 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ML400F00XGTLP00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:29:09 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ML400FWJYCLL160@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:29:09 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:29:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Completion on static functions
In-reply-to: <5167C3E2.9070305@stusta.mhn.de>
To: Markus Teich <markus.teich@stusta.mhn.de>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83d2u09jx4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83d2u6cnkv.fsf@gnu.org> <83li8o9sph.fsf@gnu.org> <20130412064749.GA14827@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83hajc9ng9.fsf@gnu.org> <5167C3E2.9070305@stusta.mhn.de>
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:20:50 +0200
> From: Markus Teich <markus.teich@stusta.mhn.de>
> 
> Try compiling with -O0 to see if these functions indeed get inlined.

No need to recompile:

  (gdb) info address print_header_stamp
  Symbol "print_header_stamp" is a function at address 0x401cec.
  (gdb) info address main
  Symbol "main" is a function at address 0x427b10.

But:

  (gdb) info address generate_full_header
  No symbol "generate_full_header" in current context.

And if I disassemble the code, I don't see any call instructions for
that function (nor even its caller, configure_shar, and its caller's
caller, initialize).

So I think it's quite clear that this function is inlined, as are many
others in that program.