From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 1vl/Jz92NWR/wSgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:01:19 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8DE251E221; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:01:19 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=sdJwSK0u; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAF31E110 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E44C385627B for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:01:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5E44C385627B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1681225275; bh=6eRxYFQnBKZYfuED3W/ra9KmjzYcTF4bmbzWYjeQS5k=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=sdJwSK0unHAfGPNcF3l44X1K/YQjdYNjiNxVUvrxLiMk1RZrpzpgiaiYB3H4i2dwN 6aZVvm80e8Hmzh54OYKYumOb5PbUX7UJy5T9jgcopHMVeYC2Csz4D06/jSQaNjiU5D Nq2CDeHkgjoSOk0WL6vw8Fg0ZznnAWKifAI7hkNI= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DCB9385701A; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:59:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0DCB9385701A Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmFSs-0001Gn-LG; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:59:22 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmFSs-0001VF-4x; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:59:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:00:04 +0300 Message-Id: <83cz4aa2h7.fsf@gnu.org> To: Simon Marchi Cc: nickc@redhat.com, binutils@sourceware.org, siddhesh@gotplt.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> <838rf4ou73.fsf@gnu.org> <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:23:05 -0400 > Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, siddhesh@gotplt.org, gdb@sourceware.org > From: Simon Marchi > > On 4/11/23 09:29, Nick Clifton via Gdb wrote: > > Hi Eli, > > > >> Thanks. A minor nit: does it have to be a .md file? Can it be a .txt > >> file instead? > > > > Sure - no problem. In fact until you asked I just assumed that .md == .txt. > > But I see no need for any markup capabilities so using .txt files is fine with me. > > FWIW, I like .md files, they read well as just text, but are also > displayed nicely when viewed in contexts like git web views. I don't > see any downsides to using it. The markup gets in the way, unless you use a viewer that supports markdown. But I thought Nick said he didn't intend to use any markup? if so, we are talking plain text anyway, and a .md file name will just mislead.