From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21121 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2015 10:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20898 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2015 10:46:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:46:23 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIM00400LLT5300@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:46:20 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIM0043LLX81J30@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:46:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:01:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB BuildBot In-reply-to: <54C21AC9.7000109@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: sergiodj@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83a919u64i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bnm1exo6.fsf@redhat.com> <87lhkvd9u7.fsf@redhat.com> <837fwevg2b.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3um8xvu.fsf@redhat.com> <831tmmvepo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mw5a8x34.fsf@redhat.com> <83y4outyxl.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppa67fqb.fsf@redhat.com> <83vbjytv2s.fsf@gnu.org> <83twzitur9.fsf@gnu.org> <83sif2tucs.fsf@gnu.org> <87sif25vzr.fsf@redhat.com> <83ppa5uaqj.fsf@gnu.org> <54C21AC9.7000109@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:56:25 +0000 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: gdb@sourceware.org > > > I don't think we need to go that far. Simply adding "cd $(srcdir) &&" > > to the TAGS rules that don't already do that should be good enough. > > Yes, we should do that. It's what we do to other similar rules > that generate files in the source dir, like e.g., > > $(srcdir)/aclocal.m4: @MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@ $(aclocal_m4_deps) > cd $(srcdir) && $(ACLOCAL) $(ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS) I'll look into the libiberty problem when I have time. I don't understand why VPATH didn't do its job in that case.