From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12047 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2014 17:25:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11985 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2014 17:25:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:25:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4S00800Z1ZQ400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:25:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4S0088LZ2LPF10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:25:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:36:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system In-reply-to: <8738gw6p4b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> To: Tom Tromey Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gbenson@redhat.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <837g68m4ix.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140402100842.GA956@blade.nx> <533F3713.40700@earthlink.net> <20140417135040.GA891@blade.nx> <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> <8738gw6p4b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Gary Benson , Stan Shebs , gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:07:32 -0600 > > I was keen on gerrit until I read this: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg00232.html > > Maybe phabricator is better for our needs? > > I've been trying the patchworks install as well. I don't find it all > that useful myself, but maybe it would be better if more people were > using it. Perhaps we should begin by formulating a set of minimum requirements for the tool we need and want.