From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18533 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 18:31:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 18524 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 18:31:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:31:21 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZH00A00Q07KL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:30:47 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.182.236]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZH007ZXQ3A9S80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:30:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:31:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Getting pissed off by gdb. Please help with stepping in. In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: temp@sourceboost.com, gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <834okdv5wb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <11611.203.63.255.139.1268879984.squirrel@webmail5.pair.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:10:41 -0700 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: temp@sourceboost.com, gdb@sourceware.org > > Here's what gdb 7.1 does: > > (gdb) f > #0 bar () at stepout.c:4 > 4 int bar () { return 1; } > (gdb) s > foo (x=1) at stepout.c:6 > 6 void foo (int x) { g = x; } > (gdb) > > Note that we've stepped out of bar and into foo. > > Here is what Pavel is expecting instead: > > (gdb) f > #0 bar () at stepout.c:4 > 4 int bar () { return 1; } > (gdb) s > 0x00000000004003b7 in main () at stepout.c:11 > 11 foo (bar ()); > (gdb) Thanks. But why is ``what Pavel is expecting'' useful? What use-case does it handle that the v7.1 behavior does not?