From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id lGDIOUHcCmEPHAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:28:17 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D5DAE1EDE3; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:28:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CDC1E79C for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:28:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CCE3951E7E for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:28:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C6CCE3951E7E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1628101696; bh=m5WFz69Eo5qK5VzylTyu8qDkSNuwSUxJKngpG1T3wxQ=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=jdTJ3WXJteakoCYRpXSs9LAeZRJ3JHJMGNc14Vy5gx8OcjzEN9j6ylEvF6sTF4Kw8 +UShZ0NPMnOYta4LtgUKTUbkgK/eQuUyYNp65EE9OgnE87MiASHopvw0FqJ3lCOKL7 R6Z1r238RNHr8YQEvs2g/BKB+oviGziKkkV9iD34= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A987385800E for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:27:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2A987385800E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBLcM-0001UW-Ta; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:27:51 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4994 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBLcJ-0005IK-LC; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:27:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:27:32 +0300 Message-Id: <834kc5kquj.fsf@gnu.org> To: Joel Sherrill In-Reply-To: (message from Joel Sherrill via Gdb on Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:33:34 -0500) Subject: Re: offlist - QNX Assignment Paperwork References: X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:33:34 -0500 > From: Joel Sherrill via Gdb > > Hi > > I didn't want to post this online but QNX has changed corporate hands > at least twice over the past couple of decades. Is the assignment > paperwork still binding? > > Wikipedia shows 2004 and 2010 changes in ownership.along with some > corporate name changes. > > I honestly have no idea how any of that impacts the assignment > paperwork but wanted to ask if this is something the FSF should > comment on. I don't know, you should ask copyright-clerk@fsf.org.