From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37108-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20784 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 18:33:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 20769 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 18:33:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:33:24 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZH00A00Q48SK00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:32:21 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.182.236]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZH002TRQ5V1LK0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:32:21 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:33:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Getting pissed off by gdb. Please help with stepping in.
In-reply-to: <201003181521.48681.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dje@google.com, temp@sourceboost.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <8339zxv5tp.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <11611.203.63.255.139.1268879984.squirrel@webmail5.pair.com> <E1NsBhj-0007rq-7D@fencepost.gnu.org> <e394668d1003180810wc60e1b6w888973df227ccbc8@mail.gmail.com> <201003181521.48681.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:48 +0000
> Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
>  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>  temp@sourceboost.com
> 
> On Thursday 18 March 2010 15:10:41, Doug Evans wrote:
> > The behaviour Pavel describes in his message, but which I do not see, is this:
> > 
> > (gdb) f
> > #0  bar () at stepout.c:4
> > 4       int bar () { return 1; }
> > (gdb) s
> > main () at stepout.c:12
> > 12        return 0;
> > (gdb)
> > 
> > Note that we've stepped out of bar, into foo, and back out of foo.
> 
> He most probably used "next" when he said:
> 
> > I do a step out and wtf... Instead of getting back to the line
> > where 'foo' is called I get passed it.

I would expect "next" on line 4 to behave the same as "step", since
there's no function call there.