From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JcZLLU8soF80EgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:57:03 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AB3FC1F08B; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:57:03 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1078A1E58E for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:57:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE333840C1B; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:57:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BAE333840C1B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1604332622; bh=yqZaU9YID9u4nJVUSVFsTF+CGbLtIZedG51h/Jkj+iE=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=HGO5oqgfDU1eCHg6k96CDIqq2U3nsy99A5j6N+SqMR9NGy6+8HKEmJaJLf0mGR8uZ j2a7FKIyf83VjN+SDO68ZCBqLlgGe0r7YtzBrw926gxQWLzV+oMPQyIX+4NMJsTQbw Y+LyVfibIYYgz0eN2ZQlX06uYePeMxbDL0kUJLfo= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4423840C1B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:57:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5E4423840C1B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZcCZ-0004L0-JG; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:56:59 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2438 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZcCV-0004mK-TZ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:56:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:56:47 +0200 Message-Id: <83361reoqo.fsf@gnu.org> To: Alexander Fedotov In-Reply-To: (message from Alexander Fedotov via Gdb on Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:53:47 +0300) Subject: Re: duplicated html help files References: X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:53:47 +0300 > From: Alexander Fedotov via Gdb > > I am doing a GDB 9.2 build using MinGW on a linux machine and found that > GDB documentation generates files frame-apply.html and Frame-Apply.html. > The difference is in filename case only. > Whilst this is fine on linux this makes a problem to unpack tarball on > windows.Yes, it is possible to workaround this by corresponding switch to > unpack utility and overwrite file. But this breaks HTML helps I guess... I believe you are talking about building the HTML version of the GDB manual. If so, please report this problem to the Texinfo developers (bug-texinfo@gnu.org), since GDB just uses the Texinfo tools to produce the docs. It's a Texinfo problem that it creates such file-name clashes on case-insensitive filesystems.