From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id i9NbFhJ+TGD+fgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:55:46 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4E0391EF78; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:55:46 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3E11E54D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:55:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405053896C12; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:55:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 405053896C12 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615625744; bh=ZU5O5VtlpQI1ifYvgm0v1/9+/qY9rK+So+6FOw1xPmk=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=V2Z2KjWWuclXXsTs2RbztgWy7UvDXMjvNlX2Yf6+t0zTtQuxzUQg3moLx9757Or/v v1gNZfvlYgcGPM9zMb9bdwROrqFGJqi/f1t/3GBfRmA2irlMvCk5TPZtMk1t4yt431 d77V8Y81f508oEb/sq8NKq0qlmGFcOT3umIQTONg= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09E63896C0B for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:55:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D09E63896C0B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL03h-0001Vi-5j for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:55:41 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3342 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lL03g-0003es-60 for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 03:55:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:55:47 +0200 Message-Id: <8335wzjuuk.fsf@gnu.org> To: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <83h7loun5e.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii via Gdb on Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:56:13 +0200) Subject: Re: Demangling in backtraces References: <83h7loun5e.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Ping! Does the silence mean we don't have such a feature in GDB? > Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 20:56:13 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb > > I have built a C program linked against libgccjit. When it crashes, > the backtrace shows mangled names, like this: > > #0 0x70f5ac3e in libgccjit-0!_Z17gimple_build_callP9tree_nodejz () > from D:\usr\bin\libgccjit-0.dll > #1 0x7190fa7b in libgccjit-0!_ZN19evrp_range_analyzer5leaveEP15basic_block_def > () from D:\usr\bin\libgccjit-0.dll > #2 0x71910eef in libgccjit-0!_Z36stmt_uses_0_or_null_in_undefined_wayP6gimple > () from D:\usr\bin\libgccjit-0.dll > #3 0x710fba2c in libgccjit-0!_Z16execute_one_passP8opt_pass () > from D:\usr\bin\libgccjit-0.dll > > (This is because libgccjit is written in C++, and because the DLL is > stripped.) > > How can I cause GDB to demangle the function names when showing the > backtrace in this case? I tried setting language to c++, but that > didn't help. > > TIA >