From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12130 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 19:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12116 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2010 19:38:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:38:07 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZH00E00SZV2M00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:38:04 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.182.236]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZH00CHNT7FXW30@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:38:04 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:38:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Getting pissed off by gdb. Please help with stepping in. In-reply-to: <201003181855.39643.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dje@google.com, temp@sourceboost.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <831vfhv2s5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <11611.203.63.255.139.1268879984.squirrel@webmail5.pair.com> <201003181521.48681.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8339zxv5tp.fsf@gnu.org> <201003181855.39643.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:55:39 +0000 > Cc: dje@google.com, > temp@sourceboost.com > > Users often find this behaviour unexpected (I've often > wished GDB would behave like what the OP is suggesting too). Then why don't we change the behavior to match what users expect?