From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36223 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2017 09:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36198 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2017 09:46:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1014, TRANSCRIPT, didier, Didier X-HELO: mail-wr0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f170.google.com) (209.85.128.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:46:52 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 77so260138387wrb.1 for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 02:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ythcRhAmGDdNgYKgHqhsRZTLR8f9K4qtNeoW1VRLI+g=; b=lVJ13D0CcTh7PiJn/Un4FxWEltql5LJpU53NOezMUpAgjW09GOoQsc21kmAYWD3etn j48d5LjDAnXVLd24gY6Tc5YAp+1dhvi/HdaJOZQ1AP/T007crIB6MQpmVQLYUDPjhKyJ VFOJkZ+d1ziFDplSH6DZwOXSobwQEM8M9DqUwf1stPDzUtSsk0/cCJpUYzRd94v+auC0 UBmYsSgZFacwsKy468D4bzB7rUhzqZb1GYS6sujHQDNPf8A6g0gVYAEKgsrvhKvOIkdL 8cpjFeDHK3XCQohJ0/UP/dCMZ0dGV0e2cysmAKj0/venisGjUNwFITSx5vt1ZFRfjjZP xQdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxv0YlHUCalPtqF/Y1ivsAc4vbYeYAHSCTnhbmDBa3rYu6A7uhX TCLwkcrhCDN1a0xvRrlQNQ== X-Received: by 10.223.163.152 with SMTP id l24mr36946309wrb.203.1499248010458; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 02:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4? ([2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n71sm23937059wrb.62.2017.07.05.02.46.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jul 2017 02:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: MI / Python tests failing on my machine (x86_64) To: Jan Vrany , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <1499236932.24598.1.camel@fit.cvut.cz> From: Phil Muldoon Message-ID: <830dcdc7-9162-d9e4-2f5b-ad6ea068c137@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:46:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1499236932.24598.1.camel@fit.cvut.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On 05/07/17 07:42, Jan Vrany wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm experimenting with Didier Nadeau's patches for python-defined > MI commands [1] > > I tried to compile recent gdb (25c5412713ba) and then run MI and python > tests to ensure all is OK before I start hacking. > > I run these tests using: > > make check RUNTESTFLAGS='TRANSCRIPT=y gdb.mi/*.exp gdb.python/*.exp' > > but 58 tests seems to fail: > > # of expected passes 4810 > # of unexpected failures 58 > # of expected failures 9 > # of known failures 13 > # of untested testcases 3 > # of unsupported tests 1 I don't see this from HEAD. > > For GDB 8.0.0 (1f1c02597cc1) test results are the same on my machine. > I compiled gdb on Linux (Debian Jessie if that matters) using simple > > ./configure && make > > Is that expected? Do I need to perform some additional setup to run > tests? What tests fail and why? It's difficult to work out what is going on without some trail to follow. Cheers Phil