From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21625 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 18:19:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 21617 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2008 18:19:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:19:40 +0000 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so3385105ika.2 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.1 with SMTP id z1mr11930058waz.123.1204309175870; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.75.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7f45d9390802291019o762c6bcby57e88f4134ae510e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:22:00 -0000 From: "Shaun Jackman" Reply-To: "Shaun Jackman" To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Modifying a verboten register In-Reply-To: <20080229134004.GA2573@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7f45d9390605040745o4c332058te1e289e5d5e9620@mail.gmail.com> <20060504145211.GB32605@nevyn.them.org> <7f45d9390605040815x5be2bcb8t921b2dd528335565@mail.gmail.com> <7f45d9390607121616j39879186x760c2d14f54dc49@mail.gmail.com> <7f45d9390802282037n3d43c1dcm3409bac64ab24827@mail.gmail.com> <20080229134004.GA2573@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:37:58PM -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > Was this patch ever applied to the trunk? I've just checked that the > > bug still exists in gdb 6.7. The above patch was from 2006-July circa > > gdb 6.5 days. > > That patch will not be applied; as I mentioned at the time, it's a > nasty hack. Unfortunately, no one has had time to work on this > problem. Okay. Well, thanks for the hack in any case. Cheers, Shaun