From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31209-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30945 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 04:38:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 30934 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2008 04:38:29 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:38:00 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so4691303waf.18         for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.197.1 with SMTP id u1mr330354waf.61.1204259878921;         Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.75.3 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7f45d9390802282037n3d43c1dcm3409bac64ab24827@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:13:00 -0000
From: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: Modifying a verboten register
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <7f45d9390607121616j39879186x760c2d14f54dc49@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7f45d9390605040745o4c332058te1e289e5d5e9620@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20060504145211.GB32605@nevyn.them.org> 	 <7f45d9390605040815x5be2bcb8t921b2dd528335565@mail.gmail.com> 	 <7f45d9390607121616j39879186x760c2d14f54dc49@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 3:16 PM, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On 5/4/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
>  > ...
>  > > I posted an explanation of this problem on gdb-patches yesterday, as it
>  > > happens, with a nasty hack.
>  >
>  > Wonderful news! Thanks, Daniel.
>
>  This patch [1] works for me to work around the `Value being assigned
>  to is no longer active' bug. Thanks, Daniel.
>
>  Cheers,
>  Shaun
>
>  [1] http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-05/msg00018.html

Hi Daniel,

Was this patch ever applied to the trunk? I've just checked that the
bug still exists in gdb 6.7. The above patch was from 2006-July circa
gdb 6.5 days.

Cheers,
Shaun