From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21420-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11863 invoked by alias); 6 May 2005 16:35:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11198 invoked from network); 6 May 2005 16:35:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.199)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 May 2005 16:35:11 -0000
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so820400rne
        for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 06 May 2005 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.11.94.35 with SMTP id r35mr39963cwb;
        Fri, 06 May 2005 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.11.99.70 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2005 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7f45d939050506093578e17a4b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 16:35:00 -0000
From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Disassembling ARM and Thumb code
In-Reply-To: <20050506040755.GA7038@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7f45d93905050517053a33f3c9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050506015559.GA3922@nevyn.them.org>
	 <7f45d93905050520353a1dc5ed@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050506040755.GA7038@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2

On 5/5/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > Hehe. I agree, that's probably not the best plan. However, for the
> > unique case of 'x/i $pc' it does make a certain amount of sense to use
> > the CPSR as a hint. I'm not sure if it's worth the special case
> > though. An explicit switch to the x/i and disas commands to specify
> > ARM or Thumb dissection is very much a good idea though.
>=20
> Yes, probably; if you have a good idea for the syntax to use, then
> maybe we can add it.  I don't much like the idea of target-specific
> modifiers.

I like the look of this:

x/i for intelligent
x/iw for ARM
x/ih for Thumb

Another option is...

set disassembly-flavor arm
set disassembly-flavor thumb

Cheers,
Shaun