From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id kWl5FQsWQmNhMAgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:30:03 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 42E881E112; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:30:03 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=kw+vX7PS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF1E1E0CB for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D657D393BA77 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 00:30:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D657D393BA77 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665275401; bh=DDbTRdYKgZL0MbhEPcuQ8Zb9Gt49wHYyD21uzxfptY4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=kw+vX7PShnSZyiIQp+efi8/3DR9ATnmd/DL79e/Bv2PIhhSsDnR52K7eqY4Ca6B8Z 93pcGA7Z+SVnSvfON4bOdmZVMf5EBH5qZwyb4bgnamoMv9LyfvHgCbUXvTIc6NJsU1 AguBtUb71/EtGRv9pPgOxRZhG+svYjCFe7ln0Ikw= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950843858CDB for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 00:29:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 950843858CDB Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51C271E0CB; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:29:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <7d3aac6e-fd5a-c900-e88e-7ee6c143d366@simark.ca> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:29:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. To: Eli Zaretskii References: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> <790305bd-9cdf-9dbc-6b8e-b55f1f70258f@simark.ca> <834jwelc26.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <834jwelc26.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > They were followed by discussion and some changes, AFAIR. Also, the > original post was quite long, so I hoped for a concise version akin a > cookbook. I just re-read the thread and I didn't find any changes to the proposal in the original post. Maybe some precisions. In any case, Bruno will update the wiki, it should be a short and sweet section. It doesn't need to explain all the rationale like the original post did. Simon