From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1124 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 21:36:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1117 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 21:36:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 21:36:35 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin [192.168.1.7] verified) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP-TLS id 5067266; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:36:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1064611167.3f74ad5f8ed2f@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> References: <3F724CAE.3040502@redhat.com> <1064611167.3f74ad5f8ed2f@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v601) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7F6475E0-F069-11D7-964B-000A95AF1FAE@dberlin.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: GDB without traditional frames Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:54:00 -0000 To: y2bismil@engmail.uwaterloo.ca X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 On Sep 26, 2003, at 5:19 PM, y2bismil@engmail.uwaterloo.ca wrote: > Hey all, > > not sure if you remember, but I was trying to get a binary compiled on > Openwatcom 1.0 to be debugged using GDB. Anyways, from what I can > gather, > > Watcom used a draft standard for their DWARF format > Unix International Programming Languages SIG, Version 2, Draft 6, > dated April > 12, 1993 > First of all, DWARF 2.0 reached non-draft form, so i'm not sure why they use a draft version of the standard. > Just to see if its a quick fix that could be made, I was wondering if > anyone > knows the exact document GDB's DWARF abilities are based on. > GDB supports DWARF 2.0, as well as some of the draft DWARF 3.0. Please send a binary made with openwatcom so we can look at it and see what's up. >