From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id DSRFGTFlQWMg5AcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 07:55:29 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5657F1E112; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 07:55:29 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=e/btzuZ4; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA4D1E0D3 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 07:55:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84047389838E for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:55:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 84047389838E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665230127; bh=DUjLVkxTdod6FlN2yxS6F9eJqaHTctgeHW/IrgSjBO8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=e/btzuZ4suivil94EglNAfu0RPAA6MfIhmpnol1GiHZ99fJZMv9sw25GWh7MfOcsL 4X5r5mq9U2z7ZWAQ/4rpSxiYu/5ChsS6IJGw4qYrSNGZ/yzsvEyiTa/Xu/LqLMbV+j LV9NwJ6Ls0S9ErUiz5rJVfqSDazGhK7a+NiNzPvY= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D1B3858C55 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:55:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 02D1B3858C55 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AAB81E0D3; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 07:55:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <790305bd-9cdf-9dbc-6b8e-b55f1f70258f@simark.ca> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 07:55:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. Content-Language: en-US To: Eli Zaretskii References: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2022-10-08 02:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:23 -0400 >> From: Simon Marchi via Gdb >> >> We don't really have a formal process for voting / adopting proposals >> like this. Given there was no negative feedback at all (from what I >> remember), please go ahead and update the wiki. I will try to remember >> to use the tags from now on. > > It would help if the new rules for using the tags were posted here as > well, I think. Then, if someone has questions or wants to request > clarifications, they could do that right away, instead of waiting > until the first time they need to use the new rules. They were explained in Bruno's original message, and Bruno will add them to the wiki. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean. Simon