From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35581-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22424 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2009 13:19:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 22399 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2009 13:19:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,CTYME_IXHASH,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f208.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f208.google.com) (209.85.218.208)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:19:52 +0000
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so2838432bwz.24         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.34.3 with SMTP id j3mr6314038bkd.23.1253020789973; Tue, 15  	Sep 2009 06:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:19:00 -0000
Message-ID: <77f815bd0909150619y7996f1a7lfdfc2e79bbd88b22@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Which version of binutils matches the BFD and Opcode in GDB6.8?
From: xingxing pan <forandom@gmail.com>
To: gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2

Are the BFD and Opcode in GDB6.8  from the binutils or developed
separately from binutils?