From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id oSCWDGSKEWAzSgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:36 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 248D01EF80; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3E01E945 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D6A398B16C; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:44:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 03D6A398B16C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611762275; bh=M7ah3vpi+10IPHBBVt3hBILsy27b08oPJ6o4sorfQsA=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=CAcGTL99awRq731Z1oXXLAZeu7G06bP2/IhskDzomM9iJIJXQVoveavT6K4YtTEKn 1Y+1nMzy8CNnxngnPtyrjHNwrAYzvxZJOW4LDMrorGZm+NK5if5lnoHUtdTzz4yFLZ XpBV9bi+CzvDLvQyinuNFMU16vczk/PY1qjJtQKM= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F15BF395B81B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:44:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F15BF395B81B Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10RFiDQr005457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:18 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 10RFiDQr005457 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D95971E945; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: GDB 10.1 breaks Linux lx-symbols To: Phillip Raffeck , gdb@sourceware.org References: <20210127122059.4qtoiuzbexyxrmgz@fillepad.localdomain> Message-ID: <767c0e82-6a84-c429-5a45-60708df69a29@polymtl.ca> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:44:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210127122059.4qtoiuzbexyxrmgz@fillepad.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:44:13 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Joel Brobecker Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2021-01-27 7:20 a.m., Phillip Raffeck wrote: > Hi, > > the value subscript bug present in 10.1 and fixed in commit > 5b56203a7cadd545b33713e98e274e582242e090 breaks, among others, the > lx-symbols command from the Linux kernels gdb scripts, as these rely on > iterating the sections of the loaded modules, which in turn uses array > subscripting. > > As the bug fix has already made it into branch gdb-10-branch, are there > any plans to release a version 10.2 with bug fixes any time soon? > > Note: I know, you're not responsible for the gdb scripts of the Linux > kernel, I just wanted give a real-world example of consequences stemming > from that bug. > > Best regards > Phillip Raffeck > Hi! It all depends on our release manager, Joel, but yes in theory GDB 10.2 is coming eventually, I just can't tell when. I have some more series I would like to propose for GDB 10, but they are pending review. [PATCH 00/13] DWARF 5 rnglists & loclists fixes (PR 26813) https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-January/175221.html [PATCH 0/4] Fix CU expansion queue-related problems https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-November/173372.html Simon