Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pavel Chernikov" <pchernik@gmail.com>
To: "Joel Brobecker" <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdb / dbx / pstack question - getting function argument addresses from stack
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7611a2ff0806261201l62ec82adha2758dde69548df9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080626185008.GC8971@adacore.com>

Right, I should have mentioned that the "old" platform is SPARC
Solaris and the "new" platform is I386 Linux.

Thanks for the info! I guess my only option is to check how x86
OpenSolaris is doing it (IF it is doing it)...

Thanks again,
-Pavel

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> As you've mentioned previously, this only works on Solaris. Am I
>> totally out of luck on Linux?
>
> The Operating System is actually not the most important factor in
> this case. The reason why this "works" on Sparc is because the Sparc
> ABI says that the first few parameters should be passed through the
> output/input registers. There can be up to 6 registers passed this
> way.  So when dbx prints the "parameters" when there is no debugging
> info, it is actually printing the contents of these registers.
>
> You didn't say which CPU your Linux was running on, but I'll guess
> it's x86. I don't know x86 all that well, but I remember that the
> arguments are passed through the stack at an offset to the function
> frame base. So the idea that works on Sparc doesn't work for x86,
> and I don't see another simple scheme that would work on x86 either.
>
> --
> Joel
>


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-26 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-26 13:20 Pavel Chernikov
2008-06-26 14:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-26 15:03   ` Pavel Chernikov
2008-06-26 16:25     ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-26 18:09       ` Pavel Chernikov
2008-06-26 18:47         ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-26 18:57           ` Pavel Chernikov
2008-06-26 19:04             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-26 19:06             ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-26 19:11             ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-26 18:50         ` Joel Brobecker
2008-06-26 19:01           ` Pavel Chernikov [this message]
2008-06-26 19:07           ` Michael Snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7611a2ff0806261201l62ec82adha2758dde69548df9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pchernik@gmail.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox