From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id v56POT+QQGO4hgcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:46:55 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E3CA51E112; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:55 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=m8PeB1ED; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4861E0D3 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396DE382F989 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 20:46:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 396DE382F989 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665175615; bh=cFmOt+FmwDhonmphRQJuAj2HFkdco8hHa078NL9cJvM=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=m8PeB1ED+LTVgXQ7JOTQwyjqpFiRB6qoULpawnzF37iGCOmQnfwhgkC8e9mIN+Ic4 xoKD1+Az4V9biMCR0Idk2wzpcz92jb8zeEeOb7HlJ9r2PjEXYrherp3U6Ger4epEi2 UdYUn8TnMNaT5gGLkYUt4w66UyKIYC0YCtAtthRc= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8A33858CDB for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 20:46:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5E8A33858CDB Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA0681E0D3; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. Content-Language: en-US To: Bruno Larsen , gdb@sourceware.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2022-10-07 03:49, Bruno Larsen via Gdb wrote: > It's been over a week since the last response of this proposal, and all responses have been positive. Does this mean the proposal is accepted? There aren't any guidelines about proposals in the wiki, so I'm a bit lost here. > We don't really have a formal process for voting / adopting proposals like this. Given there was no negative feedback at all (from what I remember), please go ahead and update the wiki. I will try to remember to use the tags from now on. Simon