From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29077 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2003 05:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29069 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 05:50:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 05:50:43 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.144]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id AOF82480; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:50:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 05:50:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <7494-Tue21Oct2003074534+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: mec@shout.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F94640A.4010807@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:39:06 -0400) Subject: Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200310202156.h9KLuRKV001659@duracef.shout.net> <3F94640A.4010807@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:39:06 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > (gdb) info registers > > The program is not being run > > User: "Oh, okay, I guess I can't see the registers right now." > > > > So I like "The program is not being run." > > "The inferior program is not being run." would be okay too. > > Info registers works with a core file. And that is definitly not being run. Right. So how about (gdb) info registers No program or core file to debug, so no registers.