From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12914 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 19:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12815 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2002 19:18:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2002 19:18:33 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-216-113.inter.net.il [213.8.216.113]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AHH37510; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:17:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:18:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@cygnus.com Message-Id: <7458-Mon18Mar2002211046+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3C962464.1000706@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:31:16 -0500) Subject: Re: @example vs @smallexample? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3C962464.1000706@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:31:16 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Mind if I try replacing all occurances of @example with @smallexample? Please go ahead. Thanks. I wonder whether we should add a comment in the manual saying that only @smallexample should be used.