From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25856 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2002 19:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25789 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 19:24:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 19:24:05 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-223-44.inter.net.il [213.8.223.44]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BGR81071; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:23:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:24:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@cygnus.com Message-Id: <7263-Tue12Mar2002212108+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3C8E36A9.1060304@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:11:05 -0500) Subject: Re: Results of a multi-build (not good) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3C8E36A9.1060304@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:11:05 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > IMHO, -Werror is a Bad Idea (tm). With the current trend in GCC and > > other compilers to print warnings for perfectly valid C, -Werror tends to > > break good code with every new release of GCC, to say nothing of > > development snapshots people use. > > > > I think we should stop using -Werror, except maybe in maintainer's mode. > > -Werror is only enabled when someone explicitly specifies it with > --enable-gdb-warnings=,-Werror. Then how come Richard has failures on platforms that didn't use that? Richard, did you enable -Werror explicitly?