From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51632 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2018 22:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51621 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2018 22:40:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Enterprise, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: jax4mhob01.myregisteredsite.com Received: from jax4mhob01.myregisteredsite.com (HELO jax4mhob01.myregisteredsite.com) (64.69.218.81) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:40:08 +0000 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.77.36]) by jax4mhob01.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w15Me5jb001482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:40:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 1878 invoked by uid 0); 5 Feb 2018 22:40:05 -0000 X-TCPREMOTEIP: 99.253.103.29 X-Authenticated-UID: dclarke@blastwave.org Received: from unknown (HELO sedna.genunix.com) (dclarke@blastwave.org@99.253.103.29) by 0 with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2018 22:40:05 -0000 Subject: Re: Very messy results from testsuite in GDB 8.1 To: gdb@sourceware.org References: From: Dennis Clarke Message-ID: <705e5846-7792-4fc0-4275-e2216802ae43@blastwave.org> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On 05/02/18 05:20 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> I was saddened to see these results of the 8.1 testsuite : >> >> I will move onwards to a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 system and see >> what results happen there but for the moment I have to ask if other >> people are seeing reasonable build and testsuite results? > > We have buildbot ppc64 slaves. I am not clear on these ppc64 machine > details, but the number of fails is similar to what you get now. > https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/CentOS-ppc64be-m64/builds/101/steps/regressions/logs/stdio That causes me to think that I can not yet use gdb 8.1.x on ppc64. Dennis