From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>,
GDB Development <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: gcc warning with "some variable may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]" when building under msys
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b1f8652-a44f-a4d1-6497-3d9a1cfdc3cf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52ef21f6-8129-2f0e-9510-8e6545d2f2e8@redhat.com>
On 10/09/2018 08:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/09/2018 08:33 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>>> It would be good if gcc could recognize std::optional and not issue the
>>>> warning when it is used. Perhaps gdb could then just always use
>>>> optional for the maybe-not-initialized cases.
>>
>> Pedro> Really not sure whether that is possible. I think there's hope
>> Pedro> that GCC value tracking becomes smart enough that these
>> Pedro> std::optional-related warnings end up disappearing (which usually
>> Pedro> means the code will optimize better too). Fingers crossed, at least.
>>
>> For gdb::optional, I think it would be good enough if we could simply
>> suppress the warning and make operator* assert that the object was
>> instantiated. Perhaps std::optional could enforce this in debug mode as
>> well.
>
> Last I tried, I couldn't find a way to suppress the warning from
> gdb::optional. The warning triggers in code that belongs to
> T in gdb::optional<T>.
Maybe we could make gdb::optional's ctor initialize the payload
only in devel mode, leave it uninitialized in release mode,
and add back -Werror for that warning. We'd see the warnings in
release mode, but releases don't use -Werror so it's less of
an issue.
Doesn't really fix the issue though, just papers over it.
Not sure that really helps.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-04 6:28 asmwarrior
2018-10-04 12:01 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-04 12:40 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-05 5:08 ` Tom Tromey
2018-10-09 10:34 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 19:34 ` Tom Tromey
2018-10-09 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 20:01 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-10-09 20:04 ` Tom Tromey
2018-10-04 12:41 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b1f8652-a44f-a4d1-6497-3d9a1cfdc3cf@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=asmwarrior@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox