From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12814 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2009 13:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 12796 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2009 13:38:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr1.ericy.com (HELO imr1.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:38:23 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6MDcEmB022071; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:38:16 -0500 Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:37:22 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [RFC] Queries and frontends Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C2FBFF@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <20090721185508.GA16411@caradoc.them.org> References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C00023@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <19045.23703.743876.775308@totara.tehura.co.nz> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C00569@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <20090721185508.GA16411@caradoc.them.org> From: "Marc Khouzam" To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" Cc: "Nick Roberts" , X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@false.org]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:55 PM > To: Marc Khouzam > Cc: Nick Roberts; gdb@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends >=20 > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:36:38PM -0400, Marc Khouzam wrote: > > I guess it's just me then. > > But with "set confirm off", which one may choose to use, how > > would you set pending breakpoints, currently? > > You just won't be able to, right? Isn't that a problem? >=20 > In fact: >=20 > (gdb) show breakpoint pending > Debugger's behavior regarding pending breakpoints is auto. Ah. :-) Ok, then, if that is the prefered approach. Seems like it will be a pain to add special options for each new nquery() use. But if no one else feels it's a problem, that's fine with me. Thanks Marc