From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12663 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2009 18:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 12645 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2009 18:25:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr2.ericy.com (HELO imr2.ericy.com) (198.24.6.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:24:59 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr2.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5FIOvQB013627; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:24:57 -0500 Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:24:56 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: MI register groups Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA079763AC@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: References: From: "Marc Khouzam" To: "Chris Genly" , X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org=20 > [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Chris Genly > Sent: June-15-09 2:10 PM > To: gdb@sourceware.org > Subject: MI register groups >=20 > I'm working on an Eclipse interface to a debugger produced by the > company I work for.=A0 I notice Both GDB and Eclipse support the concept > of register groups.=A0 But MI does not support the concept of register > groups.=A0 I'd like to extend the MI spec to include register groups. > Who would I talk to about this? Just for your knowledge, the Eclipse CDT integration of GDB does provide register groups, but it seems to be done within eclipse. I didn't work on it myself, but I found this comment: /** * For the GDB GDBMI implementation there is only on group. The GPR and FP= U registers are grouped into=20 * one set. We are going to hard wire this set as the "General Registers". */ And then everything about register groups is being done without using MI or= GDB. If such an approach is sufficient for you, it would be much easier to get d= one. Marc