From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25042 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2008 15:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24900 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2008 15:20:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr1.ericy.com (HELO imr1.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:19:29 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9VFKtxb017650; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:20:55 -0500 Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:19:11 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Multiprocess GDB, formal spec Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06688E9F@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <48FCA958.3060805@codesourcery.com> References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA0653C051@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <48FCA958.3060805@codesourcery.com> From: "Marc Khouzam" To: "Stan Shebs" Cc: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 > From: Stan Shebs [mailto:stan@codesourcery.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 11:53 AM >=20 > I have a set of patches applied to FSF GDB, and it generally=20 > works, but there are, uh, some regressions. :-)=20 Do you think this work will make it to HEAD before March next year? > > As the multi-process work seems to be progressing quite well, I was > > wondering if it was time to=20 > > start looking at MI again? > >=20=20=20 > Yes, now would be a good time. I had to neglect MI due to time=20 > constraints on this project, but after people try their hand=20 > at juggling=20 > a half-dozen programs through the command line, I think an MI=20 > alternative is going to get considerable interest all of a sudden. :-) So does Vladimir and/or yourself have plans for MI to be enhanced correspondingly by the time this feature makes it into HEAD? Thanks for your input Marc