From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2754 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2008 14:45:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 2739 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2008 14:45:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr1.ericy.com (HELO imr1.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:44:53 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5DEin3F014492; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:44:49 -0500 Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:44:58 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Multi-process and 'inferior' Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA042911C7@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <20080613143825.GA1745@caradoc.them.org> From: "Marc Khouzam" To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" Cc: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 > On Friday, June 13, 2008 10:38 AM,Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > But maybe having GDB handle many inferiors instead of the > > one, would affect other commands? >=20 > Oh, many commands, I expect... Especially in the vague world of "set". > If you want to be able to specify different TTYs for each process we'd > need a new command.=20=20 > > The easiest thing to do would be to honor > inferior-tty for every process GDB runs (it doesn't apply=20 > when we attach). That sounds good enough. Thanks