From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31466-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1289 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2008 12:55:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 1278 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2008 12:55:53 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (HELO imr1.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:55:21 +0000
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) 	by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2QCtHWE006777; 	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:55:17 -0500
Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:55:17 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Binary numbers starting with 0b
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04290FC9@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <18409.27909.70115.986489@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2



> On Behalf Of Nick Roberts
>  > A couple of months ago it was discussed to add a 0b in front of binary
>  > numbers.
>  >=20
>  > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-01/msg00327.html
>  >=20
>  > I'm not sure what happened to this.  Was it decided against?
>=20
> If approved, I could commit my change to printcmd.c which would fix your
> problem with variable objects.  However, I'm not planning on going through
> all the yacc parser files anytime soon.

Just to clarify: my original problem with variable objects was already fixe=
d by
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-02/msg00006.html

But it seems we all agree that the 0b prefix has value in itself.
But there is not urgency.

Thanks

Marc