From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17873 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2006 21:01:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 17864 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2006 21:01:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.200) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:01:16 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so883353nzk for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:01:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.231.19 with SMTP id i19mr50642qbr; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:01:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.52.2 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:01:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <689eb3470602041301h44f1098aid8c56df4743b1e2c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:01:00 -0000 From: Anupama Chandwani To: Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: Unifining all targets on a given architecture for runtime multiarch Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, kalpak.shah@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <200602042018.k14KIBZa030464@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <689eb3470602041158v51022e42o62a9286328eb57f9@mail.gmail.com> <200602042018.k14KIBZa030464@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On 2/5/06, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:28:59 +0530 > > From: Anupama Chandwani > > > > Hey.. > > > > I would like to know if gdb can be configured for more than one > > target at a time. So in a sense it will be like multiarch gdb, where > > you can switch targets at runtime. > > But that *is* multiarch gdb. Unfortunately we're not completely there > yet... > On what lines is work going on & how far is it lead to? Im also working on it. Please mention any leads that you may have. > > I want to configure gdb for atleast 2 architectures. for eg: arm and i6= 86. > > ...so this is not yet possible. Anupama > > Mark >