Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references

Daniel Berlin
2004-02-25T18:53:59Z

On Feb 25, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>>> the constant schedule slip, ...
>>>
>> tree-ssa was never on a schedule to begin with, so what the heck are
>> you talking about?
>> If you really want to play that card, it wasn't even supposed to be
>> ready before 3.6
>> The fact that it is ready for 3.5 means it certainly hasn't *slipped*.
>
> Er, it was originally, lets say, "hopeing" for 3.4 (or was it 3.3).
Sorry.
This simply isn't true.
Nobody involved thought it would be ready for 3.4.

> Fortunatly the needed resources have now been dedicated to the task.
>
But i thought you said that the branch was consuming too many resources?

You == very bad troll.

--Dan