From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25120 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2004 19:10:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25110 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 19:09:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 19:09:57 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-206-179.inter.net.il [80.230.206.179]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id DPX74087; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:09:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:10:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <6654-Thu26Feb2004210839+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: dberlin@dberlin.org, cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com In-reply-to: <20040226150526.GB13921@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:05:26 -0500) Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040225035109.83E2F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <403C2E96.8050409@gnu.org> <1C4B9E16-67AD-11D8-9146-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <403CD4D6.3000100@gnu.org> <1037DDEA-67B5-11D8-9146-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <403CEE5C.5080100@gnu.org> <20040226150526.GB13921@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:05:26 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Then both you and Andrew underestimate the intrusiveness of DW_OP_piece > support. I don't underestimate it, I simply don't know anything about it. Frankly, I was relying on Andrew's opinion that it's good to be included in 6.1. That is why I said: [...] DW_OP_piece might be a good thing [...] Note the ``might'' part. I do agree that if DW_OP_piece is intrusive, we should think hard whether we want to include it at this time.