From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20679 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2004 12:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20672 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2004 12:02:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 12:02:29 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-224.inter.net.il [80.230.194.224]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id BBW01364; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:01:41 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:02:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <6654-Sat10Jan2004135841+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, nathanw@wasabisystems.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3FFEDD26.3080304@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:56:06 -0500) Subject: Re: "break main; run" test Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040109031621.412084B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> <2914-Fri09Jan2004104913+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <3FFEDD26.3080304@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:56:06 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Should note that I intend tweaking the doco so that "backtrace", instead > of "print args" is used. I suspect that "backtrace" is GDB's second > most popular user command How about doing both bt and p? I think they are both very central to any debugging, no matter what user polls (if we have them) say.