From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16820-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14221 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2004 08:57:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14208 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 08:57:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 08:57:58 -0000
Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-187.inter.net.il [80.230.194.187])
	by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id BBS49555;
	Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:57:53 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:57:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Message-Id: <6654-Fri09Jan2004105457+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 08
	Jan 2004 15:30:58 -0500)
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
References:  <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:30:58 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> (kind of a bit late but ...)
> Are there any "bugs" GDB would like to see fixed in GCC 3.4?

How about this thingy:

  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-12/msg00271.html

Does it sound like a GCC bug?