From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19252 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 17:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19130 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 17:25:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heimdall.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 17:25:22 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-220-98.inter.net.il [213.8.220.98]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BFH10571; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:25:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:25:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Message-Id: <6228-Tue19Feb2002192229+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com In-reply-to: <200202191416.OAA09488@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (message from Richard Earnshaw on Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:04 +0000) Subject: Re: ARI and DUP filenames Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200202191416.OAA09488@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:04 +0000 > From: Richard Earnshaw > > I've noticed that the ARI script is whingeing about armnbsd-tdep.c and > armnbsd-nat.c having a common 8.3 filename representation. OK, but why > doesn't it spot the fact that arm-linux-nat.c and arm-linux-tdep.c also > have a common 8.3 format? Because the latter two (and quite a few others) are automatically renamed when GDB is unpacked on DOS filesystems; see gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. To stop ARI's whining, add suitable lines to fnchange.lst.