From: jtc@redback.com (J.T. Conklin)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: make capabilities
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5mg0gsrn5x.fsf@jtc.redback.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010304080237.12520B@is>
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
>> Is it safe to assume that all versions of make used to build GDB will
>> understand the ${FOO:.c=.o} construct? It does not appear to be used
>> elsewhere in the GDB or binutils trees, so it is possible (maybe even
>> likely) that they do not. But I do not know how to solve a problem
>> without it.
>>
>> The problem is the "lint" target:
>>
>> lint: $(LINTFILES)
>> $(LINT) $(INCLUDE_CFLAGS) $(LINTFLAGS) $(LINTFILES) \
>> `echo $(DEPFILES) | sed 's/\.o /\.c /g'`
>>
>> If srcdir != objdir, lint is not able to find the source files. This
>> can be fixed if the rule is re-written as such:
>>
>> lint: $(LINTFILES) $(DEPFILES:.c=.o)
>> $(LINT) $(INCLUDE_CFLAGS) $(LINTFLAGS) $^
>>
>> Thoughts?
Eli> 1. The current Emacs distribution uses $(FOO:.x=.y) in its Makefile's.
Eli> While this version is not yet released, its pretest was tested on
Eli> many different systems, and none failed to build it.
Good to hear. I'd feel more comfortable if it had been released and there
weren't any recorded complaints.
Eli> 2. However, it _is_ known that not all versions of Make support that
Eli> construct. If you want to be 100% portable, you can edit .c into .o
Eli> with `sed` invocation in the rule's commands.
It gets a little tricky if the transformation occurs in the rule's
commands instead of in the dependencies. If it's not done in the
dependencies, $^ expands to something like:
... $(srcdir)/values.c i386-tdep.o i387-tdep.o ...
The sed rule would have to prepend $(srcdir)/ to each file it changes
.o to .c. Not complicated, but it might be a bit confusing.
Given the above two points, I think I'll take emacs' lead and use
$(FOO:.x=.y), but will be prepared to change it to use sed if the
need arises. Not many people will be using the lint target anyway.
I also found that $^ is not supported in all makes, so $? will have to
be used instead. It should work fine, as long as there is no file
named lint. We can add a .PHONY directive to ensure that gmake will
get it right regardless.
--jtc
--
J.T. Conklin
RedBack Networks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-21 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-21 15:59 J.T. Conklin
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-21 15:59 ` J.T. Conklin [this message]
2001-03-21 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5mg0gsrn5x.fsf@jtc.redback.com \
--to=jtc@redback.com \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox