From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-24187-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24967 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2006 16:06:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 24947 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2006 16:06:09 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.194)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:06:08 +0000
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t11so1000146wxc         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.118.19 with SMTP id q19mr5790990wxc;         Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.69.11 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5fb065d90602070806o1da129c7x@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:06:00 -0000
From: Frederic Kwiatkowski <stagedrt@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Kwiatkowski <stagedrt@gmail.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Remote Debugging on an ARM target
In-Reply-To: <5fb065d90602070716p2429a8a9v@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5fb065d90602070644mf12070bg@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20060207144930.GA18262@nevyn.them.org> 	 <5fb065d90602070706j5f95ebddp@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20060207150958.GA19288@nevyn.them.org> 	 <5fb065d90602070716p2429a8a9v@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2

I've got one last question

Using GDB, i've got now a valid address but "??" appear:
0x40000a70 in ?? ()

what is the meaning of these?


2006/2/7, Frederic Kwiatkowski <stagedrt@gmail.com>:
> thanks for all, it seems to run
>
> now i'll try to use gdb
>
> with kinds of regards
>
>
> 2006/2/7, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:06:30PM +0100, Frederic Kwiatkowski wrote:
> > > thanks, but i've tryed it already and the make step was unsuccesful
> >
> > Use a newer version of GDB or an older version of GCC.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Jacobowitz
> > CodeSourcery
> >
>