From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36652-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10554 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2010 16:03:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 10341 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2010 16:03:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f223.google.com) (209.85.219.223)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:03:23 +0000
Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so7782908ewy.4         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:03:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.96.221 with SMTP id i29mr4364548ebn.33.1263139400779; Sun,  	10 Jan 2010 08:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <5e81cb501001100803m2102dadek49c4f740d0af4d77@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Turnaround upgrade in mi2
From: Sean Chen <sean.chen1234@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

Hi,

I compared the two versions of MI (mi1 and mi2) but found no obvious
syntax change except some new commands. I think, personally, if there
is no turnaround upgrade in gdb 6.0, why did we need to accumulate the
version number to mi2? You know, there are also many new commands in
gdb 7.0, but we don=92t accumulate the mi version number to mi3 in gdb
7.0.

So I am prone to think I must have missed the turnaround upgrade in
mi2. Could somebody help to clarify? Thanks.

--=20
Best Regards,
Sean Chen