From: John Baldwin via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
To: Andrew Wock <ajwock@gmail.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Expose Frame Type and Stop Reason in python Unwinder API
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:56:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e7cd9ea-f5b5-4ad6-9ae4-dbc33a66b23f@FreeBSD.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAACtx1aThXELFEmbE3H=gjNqmBvGNwBiUka2u4ziyj_ji9psWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/21/24 22:28, Andrew Wock via Gdb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I wrote a kernel trapframe unwinder using the python API, and
> I was able to successfully extract the registers from the trapframe.
> However, sometimes gdb would throw the "previous frame inner to this
> frame" error on me. This is because unwinding a trapframe sometimes
> results in unwinding to a different stack.
>
> The way this is fixed in the internal unwinder API is that there are
> special frame types such as SIGTRAMP_FRAME which don't get checked for
> that error.
>
> Additionally, some trapframes unwind into userspace. In those cases
> I'd like to be able to stop the backtrace by setting a stop reason.
> More broadly this would be useful for any case where a user wants to
> stop the stacktrace at a certain point for whatever their use case is.
>
> I'm interested in moving forward and writing a patch for this.
>
> One implementation detail I noticed that complicates this
> implementation is that all python unwinders are internally modeled as
> a single C unwinder in py-unwind.c:974. I believe that in order to
> support a frame type feature, each unwinder will need to be modeled as
> an independent C unwinder.
Yes, I think that's true, or you'd need to have one unwinder per frame
type that you tie all the related unwinders to?
> I am proposing this here to get community feedback on whether this
> feature should be supported.
The other check I've run into is when you have a NULL function pointer
that raises a fault. There is a check that aborts unwinding unless the
frame type is SIGTRAMP_FRAME IIRC. I use custom unwinders in C++ for
FreeBSD's kgdb so that they can use SIGTRAMP_FRAME to get around that
limitation.
--
John Baldwin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 2:28 Andrew Wock via Gdb
2024-08-22 13:09 ` Paul Koning via Gdb
2024-08-26 13:56 ` John Baldwin via Gdb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e7cd9ea-f5b5-4ad6-9ae4-dbc33a66b23f@FreeBSD.org \
--to=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=ajwock@gmail.com \
--cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox