From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31349-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9089 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2008 15:25:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 9075 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2008 15:25:04 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:24:47 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so2775877waf.12         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.169.2 with SMTP id r2mr6342689wae.30.1205249084898;         Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.110.12 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5b7094580803110824t3808df2erf37df1dea91401a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:45:00 -0000
From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@gmail.com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@specifix.com>
Subject: Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <1205196740.19253.809.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5b7094580803101705m7bc6e8ffqa480a74d9b0ab548@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20080311003238.GA14908@caradoc.them.org> 	 <1205196740.19253.809.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2

Actually, this is already with -O0... at least I think.  I'm not
passing any optimization flags.  For debug symbols I'm passing -ggdb.

I'll try the CVS current top of tree a bit later today.

Thanks,
  Brian

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 20:32 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>  > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:05:17PM -0700, Brian Budge wrote:
>  >
>
> > > Additionally, I can't seem to examine any "stack" variables once in
>  > > these template functions.  I can see member variables, global
>  > > variables, and function parameters.
>  >
>  > This may be fixed, or it may be a compiler bug.  GCC is not very good
>  > about emitting local variable information in optimized code.
>
>  Can you compile with -O0?
>
>
>