From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56541 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2020 05:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56526 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2020 05:25:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:Cfje63d, H*i:sk:Cfje63d X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:25:54 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9AC51E47D; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:25:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Incorrect symbol name displayed in backtrace To: William Tambe Cc: gdb@sourceware.org References: <6b7c07bc-c461-ee85-51bb-b47478dfde03@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <5a34d21b-e359-9ef1-25a6-3c7a40a286e8@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On 2020-02-06 10:55 p.m., William Tambe wrote: > Is it possible to have pointers in the code where symbol names are > printed for the backtrace and where they are printed for the command > "p" ? For the frame, I would start at print_frame_info in frame.c. For the print command, I would break on print_value in printcmd.c. Simon