From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2006 16:34:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26173 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2006 16:34:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:34:12 +0000 Received: from relay5.apple.com (a17-128-113-35.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2FGXs5G023343; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [17.201.22.240] (inghji.apple.com [17.201.22.240]) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 88876324013; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:33:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200603151929.31842.ghost@cs.msu.su> References: <27491BE6-9DDB-4168-BDFC-9C092BF0DEBB@apple.com> <200603151929.31842.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5E57F00D-E734-47F2-B880-06FAF0308DF0@apple.com> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Ingham Subject: Re: MI and pending breakpoints Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:39:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 I thought that would work, but as I said, we don't do it that way, we do: -break-insert -f which turns the pending on automatically. I think that's a much more convenient way to do it... Jim On Mar 15, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Do you mean: > > set breakpoint pending on > > ? That's what I do (not shown in the example), and without it the > ordinary > "break" won't set the breakpoint -- it will ask if pending > breakpoint should > be set. But even with it, "-break-insert" refused to set pending > breakpoint. > > Maybe, there's was bug that's fixed on Apple branch?