From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115496 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2019 17:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115471 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2019 17:59:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:5c9713b, H*i:sk:5c9713b X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:59:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE2A13821E; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5F417D6B; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Supported Systems page on the Wiki To: John Baldwin References: <5c9713be-ef32-c17e-bba4-f07fab0af428@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <58253495-ea94-9881-29a6-80ee45a37115@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5c9713be-ef32-c17e-bba4-f07fab0af428@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On 01/25/2019 05:48 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > I was looking at the supported systems page on the wiki recently (I made > some minor updates yesterday) and noticed the second table (Supported Targets) > is currently missing. There also isn't a table for which configurations > support native targets. Thinking about this a bit more, I feel that if we > do fill in the missing second table the page would probably end up a bit > long. If we further added a table listing native targets, that would make > the page even longer. I'd think a table listing native targets would be about the same as the hosts table, though. > So, what would you all think about maybe reworking the > page to use a single table and have columns in that table for Target, Host, > Native, and GDB Server? We could then use the MoinMoin syntax for checkmarks > "(./)" to indicate which of those columns were supported for a given target. > We could also add a brief legend at the top of the table defining what we > mean by Target, Host, etc. as well. Sounds good to me in principle. Thanks, Pedro Alves