From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90011 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2016 17:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 89951 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2016 17:29:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:29:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097FB3B706; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3IHTSIA026738; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:29:29 -0400 Subject: Re: C++ conversion status update To: Joel Brobecker References: <565460FB.6070103@redhat.com> <86zixdnlfg.fsf@gmail.com> <566F13D4.9000900@redhat.com> <570D91F6.2020702@redhat.com> <20160413124127.GG31406@adacore.com> <570E51CB.6010304@redhat.com> <20160413141648.GI31406@adacore.com> <570E5A53.8070306@redhat.com> Cc: Yao Qi , "gdb@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <57151978.4050601@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <570E5A53.8070306@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On 04/13/2016 03:40 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 04/13/2016 03:16 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> We could do that indeed; or, IIRC, there is a configure option >> to force the use of C instead of C++. > > It's --enable-build-with-cxx=yes|no. That hunk above decides > the default for when the --enable-build-with-cxx option is not > specified. > > I don't mind requiring >> the user to force it; it's a good reminder (and ties in nicely >> with another comment below). > > Hmm. That's an excellent point. If others are OK with it, I'm in > favor too. I've posted a patch that does this now. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-04/msg00417.html Thanks, Pedro Alves