From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83905 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2017 21:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83849 invoked by uid 89); 29 Aug 2017 21:44:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=talks, Pedro, cauldron2017, BoF X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:44:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06A04A700; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com A06A04A700 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=palves@redhat.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5118C6933B; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: GDB BoF To: Yao Qi References: Cc: GDB From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <56a41142-a9d1-f9d2-9540-418d93b50bd5@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 Hi Yao, On 08/29/2017 11:17 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Hi Pedro, > "The GDB BoF" is scheduled in the first one, > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2017 > I feel that it is better to put it after several GDB talks, > so that we have some more context or topics in > "GDB BoF". What do you think? That makes a lot of sense to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves